The 20% Question: Should You Put More Down on Your Home or Keep Your Money Invested?

Tracy Head • September 4, 2026

One of the more interesting conversations I have with clients isn't always about which mortgage rate they should take.


Sometimes, the bigger question is: How much money should you actually put into your home?


For many Canadians, the answer seems obvious. If you have the money, put it into the house. A larger down payment means a smaller mortgage, lower monthly payments and less interest paid over time.


And there is certainly a lot to like about that approach.

But what if you also have a substantial investment portfolio that has been performing very well?


Is it always better to take money out of your investments and put it into your home?

Not necessarily.


A real-world example

I recently had a client situation that illustrates this perfectly.


The client purchased a home worth $900,000. He had enough available capital to put down 50 per cent, or $450,000.


Instead, he chose to put down 20 per cent — $180,000 — and keep the other $270,000 invested.


His reasoning was straightforward. His investment portfolio had averaged approximately 23 per cent annually over the previous three years, and he believed the potential long-term growth of keeping that money invested outweighed the benefit of putting another $270,000 into his home.


At first glance, the numbers certainly make the decision interesting.


But before anyone sees a 23 per cent return and thinks this is an easy decision, there is an important point to make.


A 23 per cent average annual return is an exceptional historical result. It is not a guaranteed return, nor should anyone assume that a portfolio will continue producing 23 per cent year after year.


Many investments and portfolios don't come close to that level of performance.


That's what makes this decision so personal.


The case for putting more money into the house is that there is something very satisfying about paying down a mortgage.


When you put an additional dollar into your home, you are reducing the amount you owe and, in turn, the amount of interest you will pay.


Unlike an investment return, the savings from paying down your mortgage are much more predictable.


Let's say, for example, your mortgage rate is 4 per cent.


Putting $100,000 against that mortgage effectively saves you the interest you would otherwise have paid on that $100,000, subject to how your mortgage is structured and how long you keep the debt.


A larger down payment can also mean:

  • A smaller mortgage balance.
  • Lower monthly payments.
  • Less interest paid over time.
  • More equity in your home from day one.
  • Less financial stress for people who prefer carrying less debt.


For someone who values certainty, paying down debt can be an excellent financial strategy.


There is also an important Canadian mortgage consideration: 20 per cent is a significant threshold. Generally, a down payment of less than 20 per cent requires mortgage loan insurance, while 20 per cent or more allows you to obtain a conventional mortgage.


Once you've reached that 20 per cent threshold, however, the conversation can become much more interesting.


The biggest advantage of keeping some money invested is liquidity and diversification.


Your home is an asset, but the money tied up in your home isn't particularly easy to access. If you put an additional $270,000 into the property, that money becomes home equity.


If you leave that $270,000 invested, it remains part of your financial portfolio and may continue to grow. Depending on the investments, you may also have the ability to access some of that capital if circumstances change.


In my client's example, $270,000 is a significant amount of money.


If that money were to earn 23 per cent in a particular year, the gain would be approximately $62,100.


Compare that with a 4 per cent mortgage.


A 4 per cent cost of borrowing on $270,000 would represent approximately $10,800 of interest in the first year, before considering how the mortgage balance changes through payments.


On the surface, that makes keeping the money invested look very attractive.


But there is an important catch.


Investment returns are not guaranteed.


The mortgage rate represents a cost you can calculate. Your investment return is uncertain.


Your portfolio could earn 23 per cent. It could earn 5 per cent. It could earn nothing. It could also lose money.

That's the trade-off.


Don't confuse a great three years with a guaranteed future

This is probably the most important point I'd make to anyone considering this strategy.

Past investment performance is not a promise of future performance.


My client's portfolio averaging approximately 23 per cent over three years is impressive. But three years is a relatively short period when you're making a decision that could affect your finances for decades.


Markets go through good periods and bad periods.


A portfolio that has performed exceptionally well can experience a significant downturn.


And unlike your mortgage payment, you can't count on your investment portfolio producing a specific return next year.


That's why I would never tell a client that keeping their money invested is automatically better than paying down their mortgage.

It isn't.


There is also something to be said for peace of mind.


Personal finance isn't just about spreadsheets.


Two people can look at exactly the same numbers and make completely different decisions — and both can be making perfectly reasonable choices.


One person may look at a $450,000 mortgage and think, "I want that debt as small as possible."


Another may look at the same mortgage and say, "I'm comfortable carrying the debt because I want to keep my investments working for me."


Neither person is necessarily wrong.


Your income, job stability, age, investment risk tolerance, tax situation, other debts, retirement plans and overall financial picture all matter.


And perhaps most importantly, your ability to tolerate risk matters.


If seeing your investment portfolio fall 25 per cent would cause you to panic and sell everything, keeping a large amount invested simply because it has performed well recently may not be the right strategy for you.


There is a middle ground

It doesn't have to be an all-or-nothing decision.


You don't necessarily have to put either 20 per cent or 50 per cent down.


You might choose 25, 30 or 35 per cent, for example, while keeping some money invested.


That can provide a balance between reducing mortgage debt and maintaining investment exposure.


The right answer depends on the individual.


For some people, the predictable benefit of reducing debt will be more valuable than the potential investment gains.


For others, particularly those with strong cash flow, a long investment horizon and a diversified portfolio, maintaining investments while carrying a larger mortgage may make more sense.


So, what's the right answer?


As a mortgage broker, my job is to help clients understand the mortgage side of the equation. I can show them how different down payments affect their mortgage amount, payments and borrowing costs.


But I don't believe there is one universal answer to the question of whether you should put 20 per cent down or 50 per cent down.


The client with the $900,000 home made a decision that made sense for his particular circumstances. He chose to put $180,000 down, keep approximately $270,000 invested and accept the investment risk that came with that decision.


His portfolio's approximately 23 per cent average return over the previous three years certainly makes the decision look good in hindsight.


But hindsight is a wonderful thing.


None of us knows what the next three years will look like.


The lesson isn't that you should keep your money invested because investments can outperform your mortgage.


The lesson is that your home equity and your investment portfolio are two different pieces of your overall financial picture and deciding how much to allocate to each deserves careful consideration.


A larger down payment can provide certainty, lower debt and peace of mind.


Keeping money invested can provide liquidity, diversification and the potential for greater long-term growth but with substantially more uncertainty.


There is no magic percentage that works for everyone.



Disclosure: I am a mortgage broker, not a financial planner or investment advisor. The investment example above is based on an individual client's historical experience and should not be interpreted as a forecast or recommendation. Investment returns vary, and not all investments or portfolios perform anywhere near this level. Before deciding whether to put more money into your home or keep it invested, you should speak with your own qualified financial advisor or financial planner to determine whether the strategy makes sense for your individual circumstances.


Sometimes the best mortgage decision isn't simply about getting the smallest mortgage possible.


It's about finding the balance between debt, investments, risk and peace of mind that works for you.

Tracy Head

Mortgage Broker

GET STARTED
Family playing with colorful blocks on the floor in a cozy living room
By Tracy Head August 21, 2026
After years in the mortgage business, one of the questions I hear most often from homeowners is, “How can I get this mortgage paid off sooner?” It’s a good question. A mortgage may be considered “good debt” because it helps us buy a home, but that doesn’t mean anyone wants to be making mortgage payments for the full 25 or 30 years if they can avoid it. The good news is that most Canadian mortgages give homeowners several ways to accelerate their payments and reduce the amount of interest they pay over the life of the mortgage. The key is understanding how your mortgage works and making use of the prepayment privileges that are already built into your contract. Start by understanding amortization First, it’s important to distinguish between your mortgage term and your amortization. Your term is the length of time your current mortgage agreement and interest rate are in place. Five years is a common mortgage term. Your amortization is the total length of time it would take to pay off the mortgage if you simply made the required payments and did nothing extra. A 25-year amortization is very common. You don't have to wait 25 years to become mortgage-free. There are several strategies that can shorten that timeline considerably. Increase your regular payments The simplest strategy is often the one that gets overlooked: increase your regular payment. If your mortgage payment is $2,500 and you increase it to $2,750, that additional $250 is going toward your mortgage balance. As the principal comes down, you pay less interest over time. Most Canadian banks offer some form of annual payment increase privilege on closed mortgages. A common privilege is the ability to increase your regular payment by 10 per cent, although some lenders offer more. That means a homeowner doesn't necessarily have to wait for a large windfall to make a difference. Increasing the payment by a manageable amount can gradually have a significant impact. Make a lump-sum payment Another popular option is a lump-sum prepayment. Perhaps you receive a work bonus, a tax refund, an inheritance or proceeds from the sale of an investment. Instead of spending all of it, you can put some of that money directly against your mortgage principal. Many Canadian lenders allow homeowners to make an annual lump-sum payment without a penalty. A common privilege is 10 per cent of the original mortgage amount, although some lenders allow 15, 20 or even more. For example, on a $500,000 mortgage, a 10 per cent annual prepayment privilege could allow you to put $50,000 directly against the mortgage without a prepayment penalty. That's a pretty powerful tool. Of course, every mortgage contract is different, so it's important to check the exact privilege before making a large payment. Take advantage of payment frequency This brings us to one of the most common questions I get: What's the difference between bi-weekly and accelerated bi-weekly payments? The difference is bigger than many people realize. Let's use a $500,000 mortgage at 3.99 per cent with a 25-year amortization as an example. The monthly payment would be approximately $2,630. A regular bi-weekly payment takes that monthly payment, multiplies it by 12 and divides it by 26. That works out to approximately $1,214 every two weeks. Because there are 26 bi-weekly payments in a year, you're essentially making the equivalent of 12 monthly payments over the course of the year. Now let's look at accelerated bi-weekly payments. Instead of taking the monthly payment and converting it to a bi-weekly payment, the lender simply divides the monthly payment in half. $2,630 divided by two gives us an accelerated bi-weekly payment of approximately $1,315. Here's where the difference becomes important. You're making 26 payments of $1,315, which works out to approximately $34,190 per year. With regular bi-weekly payments, you're making 26 payments of approximately $1,214, or about $31,564 per year. That's a difference of roughly $2,630 a year — essentially one extra monthly mortgage payment. And that extra payment goes directly toward getting the mortgage paid down faster. The numbers at a glance
House in foreground with a large wildfire and thick smoke burning on the hillside behind it
By Tracy Head August 10, 2026
For many Canadians, buying a home is one of life's most exciting milestones. You've found the perfect property, negotiated an accepted offer, arranged financing, and started picturing where the furniture will go. Then, almost overnight, Mother Nature throws a curveball. A wildfire starts nearby. As someone who has spent many years helping Canadians navigate home financing, I've seen firsthand how quickly a wildfire can change what seemed like a straightforward transaction. The good news is that many purchases still close successfully—but it's important to understand how these situations can affect everyone involved. One of the most important concepts in a real estate contract is something called force majeure . While the exact wording varies depending on the contract, a force majeure clause generally recognizes that extraordinary events beyond anyone's control—such as natural disasters—may temporarily prevent one or more parties from fulfilling their contractual obligations. If evacuation orders are issued, government offices close, roads become inaccessible, or lawyers, lenders, appraisers, or buyers simply cannot complete the necessary steps to transfer ownership, a force majeure clause may allow the closing date to be postponed until those circumstances have passed. It doesn't automatically cancel the sale, but it can provide valuable flexibility during an unpredictable situation. This is one of the reasons it's so important to stay in close communication with your mortgage broker, REALTOR®, lawyer, and lender. Everyone needs to understand what's happening so adjustments can be made if necessary. One issue that catches many buyers by surprise is home insurance. Most lenders require proof of insurance before they will release mortgage funds. During wildfire season, insurance companies sometimes place temporary restrictions or even stop issuing new policies altogether for homes located in high-risk areas. If you've waited until the last few days before possession to arrange your insurance, you could suddenly discover that coverage isn't immediately available. Without insurance, your lender may be unable to advance your mortgage funds, potentially delaying your closing. My advice is simple: purchase your home insurance as early as your insurer will allow. Having coverage arranged well in advance greatly reduces the chance of running into last-minute surprises if wildfire conditions change. It's one of those tasks that's easy to move to the bottom of the list until it suddenly becomes the most important item on it. Wildfires can also create a ripple effect that extends well beyond the property you're purchasing. Imagine you're buying a home in one community because your current home has sold and is scheduled to close first. Everything is carefully timed. Then a wildfire threatens your existing neighbourhood. Perhaps your buyers are unable to obtain insurance. Maybe their lender won't fund the mortgage until conditions improve. Or perhaps the buyers simply cannot complete the purchase because of evacuation orders. If the sale of your current home is delayed, you may no longer have the funds available to complete the purchase of your next home. That can create a chain reaction affecting multiple transactions, sometimes involving several families. These situations are stressful, but they also highlight why real estate professionals, lenders, and lawyers work so hard together when unexpected events occur. Everyone's goal is usually the same - to find a practical solution that allows the transaction to move forward once circumstances permit. If you're buying or selling during wildfire season, don't be afraid to ask questions. Understand how your contract addresses unforeseen events. Arrange your insurance early. Keep your financing documents up to date. Most importantly, stay in regular contact with your mortgage broker and the rest of your professional team. Wildfires are unpredictable. Preparation isn't. While none of us can control the weather, we can control how prepared we are when unexpected challenges arise. A little planning today may make all the difference tomorrow, helping ensure that when the smoke clears, you're still on track to receive the keys to your new home.